Strange because the same people running 911blogger are involved with Rethink911.org's parent group AE911truth.
Most of plugging is on Facebook, where the webmaster/owner of wtcdemolition.com(apparently operating out of Harvard University) writes:
https://www.facebook.com/notes/gus-espada/wtc7-and-the-rethink-911-campaign-coming-to-a-city-near-you-in-september-2013/217703478381591
WTC7 and the Rethink 9/11 Campaign: Coming to a City Near You in September 2013
July 7, 2013 at 2:00pm
As
you may or may not already be aware, a campaign is underway to raise
awareness of the collapse of World Trade Center building 7, aka the
Salomon Brothers building, on the afternoon of September 11, 2001.
The
building's collapse, in a manner indistinguishable from a controlled
demolition using explosives, was for many of us the first clear
indication that the conventional account of the 9/11 attacks was not
entirely true. It is an aspect of the 9/11 crimes that can be studied
objectively and dispassionately through the lens of science, and
therefore makes an excellent starting point for public re-examination of
the defining event of the new century.
In spite of its
significance, many people still have never even heard of its existence,
let alone its role in a singularly obvious demonstration of deliberate
deception by those in charge of the government's investigation. The
Rethink 9/11 campaign, with which I'm not affiliated except as a
financial supporter, seeks to bring WTC7 firmly into the public
consciousness as the best, most representative example of the problems
that 9/11 skeptics, often pejoratively referred to as 'truthers', have
with the conventional understanding of the events of 9/11.
Please
consider donating to the campaign in the city of your choice or to the
general campaign. I've also included links to highly recommended
material that puts forth the case for re-investigating WTC7 in quick
(Chandler) and more in depth (Griffin) form. I hope you can find the
time to familiarize yourselves with the main issues of contention should
the Rethink 9/11 campaign have the desired effect of provoking much
needed public discussion, when sound, reasoned voices will be both
effective and necessary!
California high school physics
teacher and Quaker peace activist David Chandler's analysis of his
contribution to the NIST draft report on WTC7 public comment session,
which exposed a clear attempt at covering up the free fall of the
building by the investigation's lead engineer John Gross:
http://youtu.be/eDvNS9iMjzA
Prof.
David Ray Griffin's book on the collapse of WTC7, highly recommended,
thorough, detailed account of the collapse of WTC7, and the official and
unofficial investigations surrounding it:
http://www.amazon.com/books/dp/1566567866
Official website for the Rethink 9/11 September 2013 WTC7 awareness campaign:
http://rethink911.org/
This this came a week after 9/11blogger announced the global rethink911 campaign:
http://911blogger.com/news/2013-06-25/rethink911-launches-global-ad-campaign-fundraiser-massive-ny-times-square-bill-board
And a couple of days after 911blogger owner Justin Keogh comments:
Drive by billboards
I see the drive-by billboard @ http://rethink911.org/ is less complex. Looks good.
With the the walk-by example above, people have time to read it, so
my suggestions to make it more simple seem less useful the more I think
about it.
Great project.
jkeogh on Fri, 07/05/2013 - 3:02pm.
What Espada has to say about Keogh:
wtcdemolition.com/blog/node/3250
Keogh, Justin
Submitted by gretavo on Sat, 2011-07-02 22:39.
Moderator/owner(?) of 911blogger.com, flagship fake truth site.
Then an "anonymous" user, probably Espada himself, confirms what he probably already knew:
Both owner and moderator
Submitted by Annoymouse on Sun, 2011-07-03 10:01.
These shenanigans only show that Espada, like many of his fellow twoofers can't keep their stories straight, because on his own website, two years earlier, he has Keogh as owner and dirrector if 911blogger, making his pretense not to know odd:
http://wtcdemolition.com/blog/node/2470
Meet the New Boss; Same as the Old Boss: 911Blogger's new gatekeeper is on the board of A&E911Truth
Submitted by Keenan on Fri, 2009-10-09 01:42.
So, how many people know that the new owner...er Gatekeeper-In-Chief of
911Blogger, Justin Keogh, is also on the board of directors of
Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth? Weird, huh? Especially considering that the LIHOP-esque gatekeeping
that 911Blogger became notorious for under Represensor doesn't seem to
have radically changed under Justin Keogh. Certain favored LIHOPper
bloggers, like Jon Gold and John A are treated with kid gloves and given
free passes to violate the site rules of civility and such, while their
opponents are still often banned without adequate explanation. The most
ridiculous and irrelevant LIHOPpy type of blog entries are often placed
on the front page or the "news" section, while blog entries that run
counter to the LIHOP gang's artificial (and unpopular in relation to the
overall truth movement) consensus beliefs are relegated to the less
read blog section.
To get a revealing look at Justin Keogh's thinking and attitude,
check out this email exchange between Craig Ranke of CIT and Justin, in
which Craig requests to be unbanned on 911Blogger. Reminiscent of
Represensor, Justin Keogh flat out refuses to provide a justification
for Craig's banning and for refusing Craigs reasonable request to be
allowed to return to the discussion forum in which CIT's evidence and
theories are frequently discussed on 911Blogger.
This is despite the fact that the founder of A&E for 9/11 Truth
Richard Gage has endorsed CIT's latest presentation, National Security
Alert.
http://z3.invisionfree.com/CIT/index.php?showtopic=817
Espada comments in the thread and doesn't dispute the information:
please don't post stupid crap like what I just deleted.
Submitted by gretavo on Fri, 2009-10-09 16:03.
really--if there's one thing that will make a person unwelcome here is provocateurish behavior.
Whatever it was it indicates Espada doesn't think the information about Keogh is "stupid crap". Espada's description of Keogh's conspiracy website is not flattering:
9/11 Blogger (warning:heavily infiltrated by fake truthers)
This tin foil paranoia is the title of the website
newsfeed of 911blogger they embedded in their website. Advertising and linking to a website supposedly full of "shills" ad "agents" makes no sense, unless it's in the wtcd site to boost 911blogger's page rank.
A telling link is this one promoting the Rethink911.org to rename a wireless router, sure to get Homeland Security to notice people who can then claim to be oppressed: http://wtcdemolition.com/blog/node/3474
Creative Truthing
Submitted by gretavo on Sun, 2013-08-11 16:57.
If you have a smart phone, broadcast a WiFi connection with a name that
makes people think of 9/11 truth. When the other patrons at Starbucks
go to connect to the free WiFi, they will know that there are truthers
everywhere! Be sure to password protect it lest they connect and start
downloading back issues of Inspire magazine... Keep it on even if
you're not using it, but be aware that it may cause your battery to
drain a bit faster than normal.
But the strangest thing about this website promoting a joint Richard Gage/Justin Keogh project is they promoted Rethink911.org before.....in 2008 by an anonymous user signing as Petros Evdokas, or mirroring his work:
http://wtcdemolition.com/blog/node/1303
This is a good time
Submitted by Annoymouse on Fri, 2008-07-18 19:35.
This juncture now should bring again to mind the need to improve this site,
http://wtcdemolition.com/blog/
with the following:
- clarify its editorial policy;
- state the goals being served by the website clearly;
- state clearly the methods by which those goals are to be achieved;
- clarify in plain words its relationship (stance) toward some of the
major themes, organizations and trends within the 9/11 Truth movement.
- add a page titled "About Us", or something like it, that would include
a short history of the website, its founders and main contributors, and
the path of its development.
This is a good time - some spiritually minded people might call it the "acceptable year of the Lord" - to take care of these things.
Why clarify the editorial policy?
Even though some
introductory remarks at the top of the front page (the blog homepage)
state some intentions, it is clear that the major contributors here are
oriented in other directions. Also, even though editorial decisions and
actions are taken, they are not openly acknowledged.
The degree to which this happens here is minor, in comparison to
other Truth movement nodes, but there's no reason we can't improve, and
no reason to be complacent with lack of transparency or inconsistency.
My experience so far has been that when these happen on this website
they are due to well-intentioned mistakes and mistaken policies, lack of
experience with open publishing in the realm of politics, and with some
unexamined inner personal dynamics. All these can easily be cleared
with an open heart and good conversation. So far, evil intentions and
malevolence have been absent from the management of the
website.
But we are involved here within the public arena, within the realm of politics, indeed, with the biggest,
most burning issue of September 11 which is a pivot around which the US
Peace and Justice movement revolves (and/or remains paralyzed), while
huge numbers of people around the globe are getting butchered because of
it. The nature of these realities calls upon us to be more responsible
in what we do and say - editorial direction and visible, transparent editorial process is essential to retaining the community of this website within the fold of the liberation process.
It was written here (on another page):
"...there is very little by way of an editorial policy here. this is not
a site for diplomats or politicians--it is for freethinkers, humanists,
idealists, visionaries, freedom fighters, hopeless romantics,
iconoclasts, and yogis. it reflects the insanity of the times in which
we live, yes. it is a safe space for those who desire frank discussion
of difficult topics in good faith. there are no ads, no endorsements, no
dues, no meetings, and sometimes I'm sure no readers! It's not a club,
or a political party, or any other kind of association."
http://wtcdemolition.com/blog/node/1231#comment-11719
There's good intentions running through the above statement, but the truth is a little more complicated:
1. There IS an editorial activity here and it should be made more
obvious to readers and writers. This will build more trust among us. I'd
be happy to help with it, but more volunteers will be needed.
2. Unfortunately, the gentle and playful spirit in the quote above is essential but not sufficient to
deal with the work of open publishing on 9/11. Most people who are
"active" online around 9/11 Truth - and even more so, those who are
active within our communities, in person, offline - need more
cohesiveness and community building than is generally acknowledged. Good
editorial policies in the flexible age of internet's open publishing
technologies are essential approaches to building good community.
As far as I know, there are no other online venues at the moment
within the Truth movement with the potential to serve the community -
but this potential needs to be cultivated to take root. And if the
network of people who are congealing around this website don't do it,
who will?
Why state the goals being served by the website?
It's always fair and good to accept at face value the self-expressed
words and claims that a person, an organization, or a publication uses
to describe themselves. But what if after a while those words seem to be
only the surface of a deeper situation?
The same applies to this website. The words posted right at the
beginning, on the top banner of the homepage, create a rather inviting
and all-embracing approach. But as we read on, we find that some of the
main contributors here have other goals which are not stated openly at
the beginning. Those become more apparent by where and how emotional emphasis is invested on some issues, perceptions, ideologies.
For example:
Some regular contributors here are motivated by the goal to "liberate"
the Unites States from what they perceive is a financial, military,
political and cultural domination by Israel. If that is a goal of the
website, it should be clearly stated at the beginning, so that visitors
and writers here know what we are participating in. If that is not a
goal, then it should be stated clearly by the editors/managers of the
site. The amount of material on this website which reflects the above
mentioned political goal is so much, that the editorial team has no
other option but to state a position on it.
It may choose to avoid the responsibility of taking a position on it,
but the reality of that political ideology will continue to determine
everything here, whether stated or unstated.
Another example:
Some regular contributors here often write as if it is a "given" that
blind and cartoonish versions of anti-communism, red-baiting and
red-bashing injected here directly imported from the McCarthy era are
the "normal", acceptable, commonly perceived ideology of "everyone". If
that is the ideology of those who operate this website, it should be
stated clearly. If it is not, then it should be stated clearly by the
editors/managers of the site. The amount of material on this website
which reflects the above mentioned political position is so much, that
the editorial team has no other option but to state its position on it.
It may choose to avoid the responsibility of taking a position on it,
but the reality of that political ideology will continue to determine
everything here, whether stated or unstated.
Of course, Truthers who find it so easy to ridicule others for
accepting the Official version of 911 ("but I formed my opinion by
watching Corporate Television") are accountable for their politics on
other things, as well. Oh, you were able to "free your mind" about
September 11 and that somehow gave you confirmation that everything you
thought you knew about Socialism which you learned from Corporate
Television, from Hollywood, from the US educational system and other
forms of social indoctrination ...have always been correct?
Back to the goals: at least in regard to September 11 and the Truth on 9/11, what do we want?
Some people want a new investigation to be carried out by the US
ruling class or US Government; some Truthers want Court trials; some
want Court-martials. Some Truthers want new candidates to be elected who
can change things - but what changes do we want to see in our society?
Some Truthers want very sweeping reforms of the US political system;
some
want reforms in wider areas like the economy, education, healthcare,
immigration policy, the electoral system; some Truthers want a radical
change at the very root of society, a transformation of the very
foundations of social, political, economic structure and of all human
relations within it. Others go even further and want to see the whole of
the US Empire toppled, or even further, recognizing that the Empire is
no longer an "all American" construct but a global system of
interpenetrating financial, industrial, military and political
interests, some Truthers want to see all of Imperium subverted and
replaced by a global peoples' democracy. All of the above spring
directly from 9/11 Truth, depending how Truthers see and feel it: which
of these goals (or others) are embraced by the operators of this
website?
Why state the methods by which those goals are to be achieved?
There are endless variations of possible and feasible action within the
realm of politics. There's elections, debates, journalism, publishing,
there's community organizing, educational campaigns, boycotts, rallies
and marches, protest gatherings. There's civil disobedience, direct
action, labour strikes, occupations, street fighting, passive
resistance, militant pacifism, armed struggle. Both reformist and
revolutionary campaigns utilize all of the above.
Which of these methods are embraced by the editors and managers of this website?
There is constant commentary here by the regular community of participants at http://wtcdemolition.com/blog/
on every type of political methods being applied by various other
activists, organizations and movements. But the point of view from which
those are being addressed is not stated.
For example, some of us rightly support and embrace the armed
resistance that was heroically put up against Israel by the people of
Lebanon, and we also have the clarity to recognize that the moral and
political leadership of that resistance, Hezbollah, needs to improve on
its ideology and practices regarding gender politics, sexual liberation
and class politics. Its open hostility to gay people and its negative
stance toward emancipated women and Socialists are less toxic than that
of fundamentalist reactionary forces in Iran or the Talibans, but it
needs to be seen in a clear light.
The same applies to the Iraqi Resistance. Regardless of whether the
9/11 Truth movement or the US Peace movement ever get their shit
together or not, the Iraqi Resistance is real, it is an actual force
active in the world right now, and it's going to win the war. Which
elements of that victory do we support?
What exactly are the points of departure from which we critique other
people's resistance to US Imperialism, Israeli Zionism, racism, sexism
and homophobia within the US? What exactly is our point of departure for
our own resistance to US Imperialism, Israeli Zionism, racism, sexism
and homophobia? If we want our bonds with domestic and foreign
friends and allies of this website to be genuine, we need to take our politics with genuine responsibility as well.
Why clarify the relationship (stance) toward the major themes, organizations and trends within the 9/11 Truth movement?
If it's not clear from the title, this should clarify it: beams from
outer space; UFO action against the Twin Towers; no planes at the World
Trade Center; no planes at the Pentagon; no plane (or too many planes)
in Pennsylvania; validity of physical evidence for the investigations;
validity of circumstantial evidence; role of foreign Governments; role
of domestic and foreign agents of the ruling class; role of the US
Government; the role of George Bush ...all these and more are concepts,
claims and issues begging to be reckoned with.
If the website is to better serve the wider 9/11 Truth community it
needs to state in plain words (not just ironic or satyrical
statements)what its positions are. They don't have to be perfect or
eternal positions. But they need to be stated and easily accessible in
order to help as a "reality check", and as a marker of progress. Above
all such a set of clarifying statements has medicinal and
morale-boosting value for all Truthers, even for those who might
disagree - clarity, per se, is always of great value.
Why add a page titled "About Us"?
...or something like it?
A page like that should have a short history of the website,
information about its founders and main contributors, and the path of
its development. Also a Statement of Values and Principles - here's an excellent example of one:
http://rethink911.org/
It would also have links to pages with the Editorial Policy, the
Goals and Methods embraced by the website management, and to a write up
on its Relationship to various 9/11 Truth realities, issues, etc.
A page titled "About Us" is an immediate orientation tool that's very
handy for new and old visitors to any website. Every site that respects
its visitors and friends makes an effort to have something like it.
It also provides a challenge to its authors, something like a
contract with our friends and visitors that includes a code of ethics
and guidelines by which we pledge to operate.
* * *
The current juncture, during which mass expulsions of Truthers are
taking place on other websites and campaigns of harassment and stalking
are being aimed at some of us, is a good time to actualizing all of the above.
I'd be happy to help out with this work. Please write to me about it.
Thanks,
Petros Evdokas
petros@cyprus-org.net
http://petros-evdokas.cyprus-org.net/Another-sort-of-Introduction.html
___________
Comments imply "anonymous" is Evdokas and is known to users. Meaning the website Rethink911.org appears to be a group branding effort of Richard Gage and Petros Evdokas, promoted by Justin Keogh and Gus Espada.
Domain information doesn't make it clearer:
Domain Name: RETHINK911.ORG
Registrar URL: http://www.godaddy.com
Updated Date: 2013-04-12 18:08:32
Creation Date: 2013-04-12 18:08:31
Registrar Expiration Date: 2014-04-12 18:08:31
Registrar: GoDaddy.com, LLC
Domain Status: CLIENT DELETE PROHIBITED
Domain Status: CLIENT RENEW PROHIBITED
Domain Status: CLIENT TRANSFER PROHIBITED
Domain Status: CLIENT UPDATE PROHIBITED
Registrant Name: Registration Private
Registrant Organization: Domains By Proxy, LLC
Registrant Street: DomainsByProxy.com
Registrant Street: 14747 N Northsight Blvd Suite 111, PMB 309
Registrant City: Scottsdale
Registrant State/Province: Arizona
Registrant Postal Code: 85260
Registrant Country: United States
Admin Name: Registration Private
Admin Organization: Domains By Proxy, LLC
Admin Street: DomainsByProxy.com
Admin Street: 14747 N Northsight Blvd Suite 111, PMB 309
Admin City: Scottsdale
Admin State/Province: Arizona
Admin Postal Code: 85260
Admin Country: United States
Admin Phone: (480) 624-2599
Admin Fax: (480) 624-2598
Admin Email: RETHINK911.ORG@domainsbyproxy.com
Tech Name: Registration Private
Tech Organization: Domains By Proxy, LLC
Tech Street: DomainsByProxy.com
Tech Street: 14747 N Northsight Blvd Suite 111, PMB 309
Tech City: Scottsdale
Tech State/Province: Arizona
Tech Postal Code: 85260
Tech Country: United States
Tech Phone: (480) 624-2599
Tech Fax: (480) 624-2598
Tech Email: RETHINK911.ORG@domainsbyproxy.com
Name Server: NS1.BLUEHOST.COM
Name Server: NS2.BLUEHOST.COM
But this is baloney.
An earlier record shows Richard Gage bought the domain:
Domain Name: RETHINK911.ORG
Created on: 12-Apr-13
Expires on: 12-Apr-14
Last Updated on: 12-Apr-13
Registrant:
richard gage
3527 Mt. Diablo Blvd, ste 370
lafayette, California 94549
United States
Administrative Contact:
gage, richard rgage@ae911truth.org
3527 Mt. Diablo Blvd, ste 370
lafayette, California 94549
United States
+1.4015785505
Technical Contact:
gage, richard rgage@ae911truth.org
3527 Mt. Diablo Blvd, ste 370
lafayette, California 94549
United States
+1.4015785505
Domain servers in listed order:
NS45.DOMAINCONTROL.COM
NS46.DOMAINCONTROL.COM
It's not clear if Evdokas owned it before, but it's likely. And he sold/transferred it to Gage. Looks like a joint effort of twoof between 911blogger, wtcdemolition/Harvard and AE911truth to fleece the rubes.
Whodda thought.
